Alan Gibbons

 

My writing tips…

 

First things first, you learn to write by reading. Immerse yourself in quality fiction. Instantly, you are absorbing the key skills almost by osmosis: tension, metaphor, simile, description and dialogue. To most people who want to write, this is like teaching your granny to suck eggs. Why would you want to write if you’re not an avid reader anyway!

Scribble down bits of writing that appeal to you. Work out how the writer does it. Is it syntax, the order in which the words are organized? Is it the musicality of the rhythms? Is it the nature of the vocabulary? Once you have worked out what makes it good writing, try to incorporate some of those tricks into your own.

Next, and very important, don’t trust ‘experts’, especially me! You might be told to write about what you know. Really? So you think J.K.Rowling swoops round Tesco on a broomstick, I suppose! What really matters is emotional truth. Whether you are writing something familiar, a story set in your own neighbourhood, or a fantasy story in the Kingdom of the Golden Rivers, your characters have to be real, living human beings, not cardboard cut-outs.

Get a response from your reader. Make them jump by having your character glimpse a silhouetted figure behind them in a mirror. Make them squirm by having them experience the world’s most toe-curling date. Just make them feel, for goodness’ sake!

Most of all, be passionate. Fiction is about empathy, making your reader see through somebody else’s eyes. Nobody writes a good story by being half-hearted. Give your all. Your readers deserve no less.

  • “Technology will save us if it doesn’t wipe us out first.” Pete Seeger
  • Doncaster Council appears determined to force through the £622.000 cuts package imposed upon its Library Service in the face of fierce opposition.

    The Save Our Libraries campaign is refusing to abandon its opposition to the cuts. At this week’s well-attended meeting campaign members voted to support the following measures:

    * to organise  public stall petitioning outside the Mansion House, 23rd August, 
    11. am  ( all welcome - all needed)

    * to organise a date to petition outside Doncaster Rovers, when they 
    have a home match  (” “)

    * (after invitation)  to attend and support the Unison meeting for 
    Library workers with regards to their dispute over restructuring

    * to organise another meeting for next wed 20th at unison at 7.30 (” “)

    * to let people know about Alan Gibbon’s ‘Campaign for the Book’.  
    To have a look at his proposed nationwide campaign encompassing all 
    workers and trade unionists that are involved with literature go to 
    his blog and website.

    * to let all staff and supporters know that THE CAMPAIGN AGAINST 
    RESTRUCTURING THE LIBRARIES IS NOT OVER - DESPITE WHAT THE COUNCIL 
    MANAGEMENT ARE SAYING

     

    Initial draft for discussion

    Campaign for the book

    Charter 2008

    The 2008 Year of Reading has been a great success. There have been many exciting initiatives such as the Boys into Books campaign. In many ways, reading has never been more popular. Millions of books are bought and devoured by a huge reading public. Many authors are major figures in public life.

    These successes can disguise very serious problems however which are undermining the place of the book and reading for pleasure in national life. Here are some of the challenges we face:

    *public library closures- sixty last year and more planned

    *a loss of professional library staff- down 13% between 1995 and 2005

    *more untrained volunteers instead of qualified library staff

    *fewer books in schools, a 15% reduction while there has been 28% rise in spending on education

    *a shift from books to computer services

    *the closure of school libraries to make way for IT suites

    *the sacking or down grading of both public and school librarians

    *the closure of school libraries

    *the marginalisation of reading for pleasure and the reading of whole books in many schools as teaching to the test replaces the pleasure of acquiring knowledge for its own sake

    Given the present economic difficulties, many of these challenges are likely to become more pressing.

    We, the signatories of this Charter commit ourselves to campaigning for the following:

    1.      The central place of reading for pleasure in society

    2.      A proper balance of book provision and Information Technology in public and school libraries

    3.      The defence of public libraries and librarians from attempts to cut spending in a ‘soft’ area

    4.      An extension of the role of the school librarian and a recognition of the school library as a key engine of learning.

    5.      The recruitment of more school librarians. It is a national scandal that less than a third of secondary schools has a trained librarian

    6.      The defence of the professional status of the public and school librarian. Opposition to downgrading. In some places this has reduced librarians’ salaries by up to half

    7.      The promotion of reading whole books in school rather than excerpts

    8.      A higher profile for reading for pleasure in schools, including shadowing book awards, inviting authors and illustrators to visit, developing school creative writing magazines

    Supporters of the Campaign for the Book do not see themselves as competitors with professional associations, trade unions and existing library or school campaigns. We seek to create a national network to help coordinate the efforts of all who want to protect the status of the book and reading for pleasure. We will offer our support to local campaigns and initiatives.

    It is time to stand up for reading.

    It is time to campaign for the book.

    For further information contact Alan Gibbons at: aagibbons@blueyonder.co.uk

     

    This is my letter published in the Times Educational Supplement on August 8th, 2008.

    Dear TES,

    Reaction to the publication of this years Key Stage Two SATs results has focused mainly on the marking fiasco and a drop in the numbers achieving Level 5 in English. The concern, voiced by critics of the SATs, that the pressure to ‘teach to the test’ may lead to an overemphasis on Level 4 results seems vindicated.

    The results have thrown up another issue, however. This is the fact that only 67% of eleven year olds are writing at the average Level 4 standard. For boys, the result is even worse, 60%. Students who have major difficulties writing coherent sentences and sustaining longer compositions will have huge problems gaining access to the secondary school curriculum. The most rigorous test of reading standards is not a paper full of tick boxes but the ability to internalise the skills of reading and convert them into self expression through writing.

    We have had SATs since 1992. At best, they have proved largely irrelevant to the task of raising standards in literacy. At worst, they have been an expensive distraction. Endless stale rehearsals for snap shot tests will not improve the situation.We urgently need to change course and concentrate on reading and writing for pleasure. In education engagement is everything. Nothing disengages children more effectively than the current SATs regime.

    Yours faithfully,

    Alan Gibbons

    This is a recent review of The Demon Assassin in The Bookseller. My latest novel was chosen as the top title in the Thrillers and Horror section.

     

    A genuinely scary time-shift novel, set in a well-realised London at the time of the Blitz. Lots of period details build up the setting: in the films, the billboards, the old Morris Oxford, the house costing £1,300. Yet it’s also a world of werewolves, demons and a curse that means adolescents may develop supernatural powers.

    This is my letter to the Guardian newspaper dated 30.07.2008
    Dear Guardian,
    Two excellent essays this week made me wonder where British education is going. The first was Jenni Russell’s forensic dismemberment of the Government’s disastrous SATs project. The second was Phil Beadle’s Can’t Read, Can’t Write.
    Probably the greatest condemnation of the SATs fiasco is that it has had little effect on the proportion of our youngsters who struggle with basic literacy. Phil and Jenni show why. Phil demonstrates that, if you put poor readers in smallish groups, use an undogmatic, multi-sensory approach related to their individual learning styles and make no crude assumptions about their intelligence, you have a really good chance of making a breakthrough.
    Sadly, Jenni’s article shows what happens when you have a high stakes, one size fits all testing regime. Then you get bureaucratic procedures and dogmatic ‘my way or the high way’ booster groups featuring more of the strategies that failed in the first place.
    Scrap what is left of the SATs monolith and you could redirect the resources into the kind of approach Phil demonstrates in his thought-provoking programme. The trouble is, of course, that the Government would have to start trusting teachers to do that.
    Yours faithfully,
    Alan Gibbons
    Phil Beadle
    Jenni Russell

    The Times Educational Supplement mentioned my appeal for a Campaign for the Book this week:

    Author’s novel move

    Published: 18 July 2008

    Alan Gibbons, the children’s author, is the driving force behind calls for a national conference on the importance of reading for pleasure. The aim is to draw up a charter to defend the place of the book in national life. It was prompted after the council in Doncaster, South Yorkshire, proposed swingeing cuts to the town’s library services and after England slid down an international league table measuring the reading abilities of 10-year-olds last year.www.alangibbons.com.

     

    This is a short letter I discovered in the Doncaster Free Press:

    Library cuts

    THE council would like Doncaster to become a University city, excellent, very commendable, great for the town.
    So why have they decided to cut the libraries budget yet again, reduce staffing levels and shorten opening hours?

    What are the chances of some joined-up thinking going on sometime soon?
    Yours in despair.

    Judith Morgan